==============================================
Shu-peng Ben Ho, Ph. D.
GNSS Radio Occultation Physical Scientist
NCWCP, E/RA-21 Office# 2824
5830 University Research Court
Riverdale Park, MD 20737
Tel : (301) 683-3596
Email: shu-peng.ho@noaa.gov
STAR GNSS RO Center: https://gpsmet.umd.edu/gnssro/index.php
Publication: researchgate.net/profile/Shu-Peng-Ho/publications
==============================================
_______________________________________________Hi,
The IROWG organizers now told me that they will make it possible to join the NWP discussion group on Saturday morning (CEST/UTC+2h) from remote.Let me find out more on Thursday/Friday.
Katrin
From: Katrin Lonitz via Announcements <announcements@lists.irowg.org>
Sent: 28 August 2026 15:06
To: Neill Bowler via Announcements <announcements@lists.irowg.org>; Fiona Smith <fiona.smith@bom.gov.au>
Cc: Birtukan Biadglgne <birtukan.biadglgne@bom.gov.au>; Shao, Hui CTR (USA) <hui.shao.ctr@us.navy.mil>; Neill Bowler <neill.bowler@metoffice.gov.uk>; Katrin Lonitz <katrin.lonitz@ecmwf.int>
Subject: [IROWG Announcements] Re: Discussion topics for NWP-subgroupHi everyone,
Thanks for your input!Let me ask one of the IROWG local organisers about the possibility to have remote participation. I'll update you on this topics as soon as I have some news.
Katrin
From: Neill Bowler via Announcements <announcements@lists.irowg.org>
Sent: 11 August 2026 16:55
To: Shao, Hui CTR (USA) via Announcements <announcements@lists.irowg.org>; Fiona Smith <fiona.smith@bom.gov.au>
Cc: Birtukan Biadglgne <birtukan.biadglgne@bom.gov.au>; Shao, Hui CTR (USA) <hui.shao.ctr@us.navy.mil>; Neill Bowler <neill.bowler@metoffice.gov.uk>
Subject: [IROWG Announcements] Re: Discussion topics for NWP-subgroupOFFICIAL
Hi Fiona,
If I remember correctly, last time we were in Leibnitz the NWP discussion was conducted in the main auditorium. That’s probably tricky to have remote participation, but I’m sure we can find a way if you’re keen.
The main aim of the subgroup is to provide recommendations for CGMS. So, is there a regional-specific recommendation that we could discuss (i.e. continue increasing observation density so that regional models also have sufficient observations)? We perhaps could reserve a little time for discussions of best practice in regional NWP. However, an extended discussion feels like a topic for the coffee breaks… 😐
Cheers,
Neill
OFFICIAL
From: Shao, Hui CTR (USA) via Announcements <announcements@lists.irowg.org>
Sent: 11 August 2026 14:07
To: Fiona Smith <fiona.smith@bom.gov.au>; Neill Bowler via Announcements <announcements@lists.irowg.org>
Cc: Birtukan Biadglgne <birtukan.biadglgne@bom.gov.au>; Shao, Hui CTR (USA) <hui.shao.ctr@us.navy.mil>
Subject: [IROWG Announcements] Re: Discussion topics for NWP-subgroup
Indeed, regional RO studies haven’t been a focused topic partially because we didn’t have enough data for studies. But with more data kicks in from private section, this could be a good topic. My opinion.
There is no official remote access so far. But it does make me feel if the subgroup lead would like to have remote participants, we probably can just try to use someone’s laptop with wifi. This is an old facility so I don’t know how well it could be though.
Best regards,
Hui
Announcements mailing list -- announcements@lists.irowg.org
To unsubscribe send an email to announcements-leave@lists.irowg.org